Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Green

Citations

  • 162 A.3d 509
  • 2017 Pa. Super. 140
  • 2017 WL 1885394
  • 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that violations of the best evidence rule are subject to harmless error
  • finding de minimis prejudice from evidence based on an acquittal of charges supported by that evidence
  • finding error harmless; “The jury's verdict makes clear the admission of the challenged testimony did not control the verdict.”
  • noting the error was de minimis “by comparison to the properly admitted and uncontradicted evidence of [Green]’s guilt”
  • “the rule applies if the writing, recording, or photograph is necessary to prove the elements of a case.”
  • upon satisfactory showing that proponent did not lose or destroy original, production of original excused and secondary evidence admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Bowes, Elliott, Ford, Gantman, Lazarus, Panella, Shogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.