Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Lewis

Citations

  • 623 A.2d 355
  • 424 Pa. Super. 531
  • 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding best evidence rule precluded officer’s “secondary” evidence that video recording showed defendant’s companion taking item from store shelf and explanation for unavailability of tape was unsatisfactory
  • rejecting application of hearsay rule to testimony in retail theft case regarding conduct of appellant as recorded on surveillance videotape because appellant’s conduct was not intended to convey message
  • involving testimony regarding contents of a missing videotape from a store security camera
  • involving testimony regarding contents of a missing videotape from a store security camera
  • best evidence rule applies to videotape to prevent mistransmission of facts that could mislead jury
  • best evidence rule barred police officer from testifying about the contents of a videotape; police officer did not witness the alleged act of retail theft that was supposedly recorded on the videotape

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowley, Sole, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.