Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 4/16/1993
Commonwealth v. Lewis
Citations
- 623 A.2d 355
- 424 Pa. Super. 531
- 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1269
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding best evidence rule precluded officer’s “secondary” evidence that video recording showed defendant’s companion taking item from store shelf and explanation for unavailability of tape was unsatisfactory
- rejecting application of hearsay rule to testimony in retail theft case regarding conduct of appellant as recorded on surveillance videotape because appellant’s conduct was not intended to convey message
- involving testimony regarding contents of a missing videotape from a store security camera
- involving testimony regarding contents of a missing videotape from a store security camera
- best evidence rule applies to videotape to prevent mistransmission of facts that could mislead jury
- best evidence rule barred police officer from testifying about the contents of a videotape; police officer did not witness the alleged act of retail theft that was supposedly recorded on the videotape
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rowley, Sole, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. DentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-11-25· cited 149×
- Commonwealth v. JandaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-02-10· cited 120×
- Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-11-23· cited 57×
- Com. v. Talley, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-07-17· cited 54×
- Commonwealth v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-05-09· cited 52×
- Yost v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-05-25· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. LoughnaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-11-23· cited 33×
- People v. Tharpe-WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1997-02-19· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. TownsendSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-02-08· cited 15×
- Ostalaza v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2013-06-26· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. StewardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-11-06· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. LawsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-05-08· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. BallardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-08· cited 4×
- People v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-06-22· cited 2×
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. GardnerPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 2015-03-26
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. NorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-06-01· cited 126×
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-06· cited 98×
- Kemp v. QuallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-24· cited 68×
- Commonwealth v. FarrarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-26· cited 35×
- Warren v. Mosites Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-13· cited 33×
- Reichman v. WallachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-29· cited 33×
- Durkin v. Equine Clinics, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-29· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. SchaufflerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-01-19· cited 15×
- Hamill-Quinlan, Inc. v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-22· cited 11×
- Ledford v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-09-22· cited 11×
- Anderson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-12-07· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.