Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/13/1995

Commonwealth v. Garcia

Citations

661 A.2d 1388
443 Pa. Super. 414
1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1879

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the defendant was not entitled to suppression of drugs in his pocket because they inevitably would have been discovered in search incident to arrest
holding that the defendant was not entitled to suppression of drugs in his pocket because they inevitably would have been discovered in search incident to arrest
holding that the appellant had waived his suppression issue on appeal, but stating in dicta that the contraband would inevitably have been discovered during a search incident to a lawful arrest
holding that the appellant had waived his suppression issue on appeal, but stating in dicta that the contraband would inevitably have been discovered during a search incident to a lawful arrest
noting that issues that are not developed or supported with appropriate argument will be deemed waived
the length of closing argument is a matter entirely within the discretion of the trial judge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Popovich, Elliott, Brosky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.