Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/17/1996
Commonwealth v. Boyd
Citations
- 679 A.2d 1284
- 451 Pa. Super. 404
- 1996 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2030
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is black letter law in this jurisdiction that an appellate court cannot consider anything which is not a part of the record in the case.”
- no violation of speedy trial provision where Pennsylvania tried defendant for new charges that were not basis of detainer to New Jersey authorities
- “It is black letter law in this jurisdiction that an appellate court cannot consider anything which is not a part of the record in the case.”
- non-detainer charges not subject to dismissal under 180-day rule of IAD
- party must specifically object at trial to preserve evidentiary issues
- prosecution on non-detainer charges not subject to dismissal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Popovich, Eakin, Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. ArcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-12-16· cited 183×
- Commonwealth v. ManleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-11-30· cited 182×
- Commonwealth v. StilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-07-19· cited 108×
- Commonwealth v. McBrideSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-09-18· cited 100×
- Commonwealth v. MartzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-06-06· cited 97×
- Commonwealth v. JaroweckiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-04-17· cited 38×
- E.A.M. v. A.M.D., IIISuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-10-26· cited 25×
- State v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-05-15· cited 19×
- Morrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-03-08· cited 17×
- Espinoza v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1997-05-07· cited 15×
- Grant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-09-02· cited 6×
- People v. OIKNINECalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-12-02· cited 4×
- Layton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2007-01-09· cited 3×
- State v. SteeleNebraska Court of Appeals· 1998-05-26· cited 1×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-02-26· cited 2,416×
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court· 1978-05-23· cited 731×
- Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-03-25· cited 276×
- Smith v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-12-17· cited 84×
- Commonwealth v. GarciaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-13· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. MeadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-06-11· cited 23×
- Commonwealth v. WoodsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-16· cited 16×
- Cooney v. FulcomerThird Circuit· 1989-09-19· cited 14×
- Painter v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-11-16· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.