Commonwealth v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant was not prejudiced by trial judge’s actions where jury did not know that defense counsel was held in contempt, the heated exchange between counsel and the judge was a brief and isolated incident, and cautionary instructions were given to the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Marcone
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-02-01· cited 87×
• Commonwealth v. Garcia
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-13· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Marvel
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-12· cited 3×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Clair
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-10-16· cited 732×
• Commonwealth v. O'SEARO
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-01-29· cited 219×
• Commonwealth v. Africa
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-17· cited 89×
• Commonwealth v. Lanza
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-06-21· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Harris
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-11-13· cited 23×
• Commonwealth v. Olitsky
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-06-11· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-03-20· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Riddick
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-02-27· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Griffin
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-09-22· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. McGuiness
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-09-17· cited 3×