Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Gallagher

Citations

  • 924 A.2d 636
  • 592 Pa. 262
  • 35 A.L.R. 6th 693
  • 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • opining that absolute liability crimes are “generally disfavored and an offense will not be considered to impose absolute liability absent some indication of a legislative directive to dispense with mens rea.”
  • holding Commonwealth must prove defendant acted intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly with respect to the victim’s age to secure a conviction for luring a “child” into a car pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 2910
  • noting in prosecution for child luring that § 302(c) imposes a “duty to prove that [defendant] acted intentionally, knowingly, or at least recklessly”
  • mere absence of express mens rea requirement in statutory crime is not indicative of legislative intent to impose strict liability (citations omitted)
  • mere absence of express mens rea requirement in statutory crime is not indicative of legislative intent to impose strict liability
  • mere absence of express mens rea requirement in statutory crime is not indicative of legislative intent to impose strict liability (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Baldwin, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.