Commonwealth v. Black

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that criminal intent to deprive the merchant of the full retail value of such merchandise was an element of 18 Pa.C.S. § 3929(a)(2)
• removal of a store price tag, in itself, is not unlawful without the criminal intent to deprive the owner of the full value of the merchandise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Mikulan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-30· cited 166×
• Commonwealth v. Heck
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-04· cited 62×
• Commonwealth v. Barone
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-01-25· cited 40×
• Commonwealth v. Gallagher
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-06-01· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Hennemuth
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-01-14· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Mayfield
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-24· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Ewing
  Somerset County Court of Common Pleas· 1979-01-02· cited 1×
• Commonwealth v. Kishbaugh
  Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 1979-04-02· cited 1×
• Commonwealth v. Wasser
  Northampton County Court of Common Pleas· 1980-03-10
• Commonwealth v. Bross
  Bucks County Court of Common Pleas· 1980-07-23
• Commonwealth v. Hinzy
  Somerset County Court of Common Pleas· 1981-04-30
• Commonwealth v. Mita
  Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1986-10-30