D. Hill v. Gov. of the Com. of PA, & PBPP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing a conviction where the indictment charged defendants with violating one subsection of 42 U.S.C. 1396h(b)(2) but the government's case proved a violation of another
• construing identical language in an earlier statute and characterizing the “operative distinction between the subsections” as “the nature of the referred . . . individuals or services”: “Subsection (A) prohibits payoffs for referring [ ] patients. Subsection (B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).