Skip to main content
· 4/27/1983

Commonwealth v. Vogel

Citations

  • 461 A.2d 604
  • 501 Pa. 314
  • 1983 Pa. LEXIS 527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that arrest of judgment is the proper remedy at law when the evidence presented is insufficient to support a conviction
  • reaffirming view that sanity was not necessarily an element of the crime but may relate solely to whether the accused possessed sufficient awareness to be deemed criminally responsible
  • reaffirming view that sanity was not necessarily an element of the crime but may relate solely to whether the accused possessed sufficient awareness to be deemed criminally responsible
  • counsel’s inadequacy for failure to press for change of venue did not warrant new trial absent prejudice to defendant’s fair trial rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts, Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.