Commonwealth v. Farrington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “For the foregoing reasons appellant has failed to prove all three requisites to successfully collaterally attack his guilty pleas.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1982-01-12· cited 26×
• Commonwealth v. McCloud
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-03-18· cited 10×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lego v. Twomey
  Supreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. Maroney
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-11-14· cited 1,351×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Butler v. Rundle
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-03-15· cited 222×
• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-05-25· cited 73×
• Commonwealth v. Donnelly
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-03-31· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-17· cited 31×
• Commonwealth v. Wiggins
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-29· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. Holloway
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-09-11· cited 1×