Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Smith

Citations

  • 447 Pa. 457
  • 291 A.2d 103
  • 1972 Pa. LEXIS 552

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the test to a situation where defendant claimed he was too intoxicated to understand the Miranda warnings
  • defendant intoxicated; officers testified defendant was “alert and responsive, and at no time failed to understand the nature of the interrogation or the questions asked of him”; Court found confession voluntary
  • as with consumption of alcohol, drug intake does not automatically invalidate an incriminatory statement
  • drinking does not automatically invalidate subsequent incriminating statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Bell, Barbieri

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.