Commonwealth v. Erney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• minors’ statements that they saw “beer” being served to others and that they were served “beer” was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the beverage served was a “malt or brewed beverage” under the statute
• “The Commonwealth made no effort to prove that the beverage was a “malt or brewed beverage” as defined in the Code, apparently being content to rest on statements by the minors involved that the were served “beer” and that the saw “beer” being served to others.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Trunzo
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-04-23· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Oliver
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-05-07· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Tau Kappa Epsilon
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-06-16· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Harvey
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-11-08· cited 6×
• Appeal of Charsuner Bar Corp.
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-08-18· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Weller
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-11-05· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Green Gate Inn Liquor License Case
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-01-21· cited 10×