Commonwealth v. Weller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Had the ... cans of beer been properly offered and received into evidence at trial, then the sufficiency of the evidence presented could not be questioned, as we could take judicial notice of the fact that Coors Lite beer is a malt or brewed beverage satisfying the statutory definition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Trunzo
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-04-23· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Harvey
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-11-08· cited 6×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Erney
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-03-21· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Tau Kappa Epsilon
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-06-16· cited 6×