· 3/21/1968
Commonwealth v. Erney
Citations
- 212 Pa. Super. 174
- 239 A.2d 818
- 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1088
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- minors’ statements that they saw “beer” being served to others and that they were served “beer” was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the beverage served was a “malt or brewed beverage” under the statute
- “The Commonwealth made no effort to prove that the beverage was a “malt or brewed beverage” as defined in the Code, apparently being content to rest on statements by the minors involved that the were served “beer” and that the saw “beer” being served to others.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ervin, Wright, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding, Weight
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.