Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Ellis

Citations

  • 608 A.2d 1090
  • 415 Pa. Super. 220
  • 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that “the administration of a blood test is a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment if it is performed by an agent of the government”
  • providing that “the administration of a blood test is a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment if it is performed by an agent of the government”
  • providing that “the administration of a blood test is a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment if it is performed by an agent of the government”
  • stating where hospital personnel take blood for their own reasons and then freely volunteer the results to police, hospital personnel do not act as agents of the police
  • stating where hospital personnel take blood for their own reasons and then freely volunteer the results to police, hospital personnel do not act as agents of the police
  • “[T]he primary purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter unlawful police conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowley, Montemuro, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.