Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Bell

Citations

  • 167 A.3d 744
  • 2017 Pa. Super. 236
  • 2017 WL 3046937
  • 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 545

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that it is constitutionally permitted under Fourth Amendment, as interpreted in Birchfield, to deem that motorists have consented to admission in criminal DUI proceedings of evidence of refusal to take blood test
  • Commonwealth permitted to take appeal from trial court order granting new trial based on claim that court erroneously admitted evidence of defendant’s refusal to submit to a blood test at his DUI trial
  • Commonwealth permitted to take appeal from trial court order granting new trial based on claim that court erroneously admitted evidence of defendant’s refusal to submit to a blood test at his DUI trial
  • “Our courts have established that

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shogan, Moulton, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.