Skip to main content

Com. v. Snyder, D.

Citations

  • 289 A.3d 1121
  • 2023 Pa. Super. 19

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding an excessive sentence claim coupled -7- J-S02036-25 with a claim of disregard for appellant's “rehabilitative potential” raises a substantial question
  • finding an excessive sentence claim coupled with a claim of disregard for appellant’s “rehabilitative potential” raises a substantial question
  • finding an excessive sentence claim coupled with a claim of disregard for appellant's “rehabilitative potential” - 25 - J-A26019-23 raises a substantial question
  • stating sentencing guidelines are “purely advisory in nature,” and a “sentencing court is permitted to deviate from the sentencing guidelines” where it places “on the record its reasons for the deviation.” (citations omitted)
  • stating sentencing guidelines are “purely advisory in nature,” and a “sentencing court is - 23 - J-S16023-23 permitted to deviate from the sentencing guidelines” where it places “on the record its reasons for the deviation.” (citations omitted)
  • emphasizing the sentencing guidelines are “purely advisory in nature” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLaughlin, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.