Skip to main content
· 5/15/2000

Commonwealth v. Sierra

Citations

  • 752 A.2d 910
  • 2000 Pa. Super. 151
  • 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 667

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that sentence of total confinement and of statutory maximum following probation revocation for technical violations raises substantial question
  • holding that total confinement sentence following revocation for technical probation violation implicates fundamental norms that underlie sentencing process
  • holding that total confinement sentence following revocation for technical probation violation raises a substantial question
  • recognizing that consideration of the appropriateness of a sentence of total confinement, upon the revocation of probation, must be examined in light of 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9771(c)
  • holding that after review of the record, trial court did not abuse its discretion where it had in-depth knowledge of the defendant, that parole and probation were ineffective in rehabilitating her; therefore, incarceration was appropriate
  • stating that a substantial question is presented when a technical probation violation results in a revocation sentence of total confinement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sole, Todd, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.