Commonwealth v. Daniels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where consent found to be invalid because it was the product of an illegal detention and not the result of an independent act of free will.
• where consent found to be invalid because it was the product of an illegal detention and not the result of an independent act of free will.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Lopez
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-05-14· cited 124×
• Commonwealth v. Bennett
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-03-03· cited 37×
• Commonwealth v. Wright
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-02-26· cited 36×
• Commonwealth v. Jackson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-08-02· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Vasquez
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-10-28· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Reiss
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-22· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Gayle
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-03-13· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Tindell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-08-09· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Kennedy
  Bucks County Court of Common Pleas· 1992-08-25
• Commonwealth v. Derk
  Snyder County Court of Common Pleas· 1993-05-03

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Florida v. Royer
  Supreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
• United States v. Mendenhall
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
• United States v. Sokolow
  Supreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
• Dunaway v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 3,633×
• United States v. Place
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
• Commonwealth v. Lidge
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-11-16· cited 22×