Skip to main content
· 11/10/2003

Commonwealth v. Rhoads

Citations

  • 836 A.2d 159
  • 2003 Pa. Super. 419
  • 2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4012

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Megan’s Law does not offend the separation of powers doctrine because the law is substantive, not procedural
  • Megan’s Law does not offend the one-bill/one-subject requirement because all the laws passed in the bill containing Megan’s law were germane to one general subject

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melvin, Todd, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.