· 11/10/2003
Commonwealth v. Rhoads
Citations
- 836 A.2d 159
- 2003 Pa. Super. 419
- 2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4012
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Megan’s Law does not offend the separation of powers doctrine because the law is substantive, not procedural
- Megan’s Law does not offend the one-bill/one-subject requirement because all the laws passed in the bill containing Megan’s law were germane to one general subject
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Melvin, Todd, Tamilia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.