Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Cooley

Citations

  • 398 A.2d 637
  • 484 Pa. 14
  • 1979 Pa. LEXIS 484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Commonwealth did not lay a proper foundation for admissibility of a writing as a past recollection recorded where it was not established that witness had determined that the writing was accurate
  • prosecutor failed to show on the record that detective had no present recollection of contents of writing after reviewing it
  • witness must “lack a present recollection of the event” to justify admission of record of past recollection
  • delay of three and one-half years
  • delay of three and one-half years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagen, Roberts, Nix, Manderino, Larsen, O'Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.