Commonwealth v. Sal-Mar Amusements, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding witness’s memory properly refreshed with his notes that a secretary had typed
• \We are mindful that a court may consider violations of the crimes code when deciding whether the closure of an establishment is proper\ under Section 6-611(a)
• since it is clear that one of the parties would continue to suffer some detriment from lower court’s decision, Superior Court denied motion to quash based on mootness and addressed merits
• since it is clear that one of the parties would continue to suffer some detriment from lower court's decision, Superior Court denied motion to quash based on mootness and addressed merits
• trial court properly denied motion for recusal where allegations forming the basis of the motion were “vague and unfounded”
• although technically moot, the case was considered because the issue would recur, and one of the parties continued to suffer detriment from the lower court's decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).