Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 7/2/1981

Commonwealth v. Shaw

Citations

431 A.2d 897
494 Pa. 364
1981 Pa. LEXIS 891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that confession was admissible despite illegal' arrest where “the single apparent motivation for [the co-defendant’s] confession^ which was introduced against appellant], was appellant’s confession implicating him”
concluding that confession was admissible despite illegal' arrest where “the single apparent motivation for [the co-defendant’s] confession^ which was introduced against appellant], was appellant’s confession implicating him”
concluding that confession was admissible despite illegal' arrest where “the single apparent motivation for [the co-defendant’s] confession^ which was introduced against appellant], was appellant’s confession implicating him”
concluding that confession was admissible despite illegal' arrest where “the single apparent motivation for [the co-defendant’s] confession^ which was introduced against appellant], was appellant’s confession implicating him”
Supreme Court may affirm trial court's decision if result is correct on any ground, without regard to grounds which trial court itself relied upon
Supreme Court may affirm trial court’s decision if result is correct on any ground, without regard to grounds which trial court itself relied upon

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larsen, Nix

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.