Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 3/7/2014
Commonwealth v. Colon
Citations
- 87 A.3d 352
- 2014 Pa. Super. 45
- 2014 WL 895216
- 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a constitutional claim of violation of speedy trial rights is separate from a Rule 600 issue
- holding that Rule 600 “was adopted to protect defendant’s constitutional rights to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment [to] the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 9 of the Pennsylvania Constitution” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- stating that it is the Commonwealth that has the burden of demonstrating it exercised due diligence in bringing the defendant to trial on time
- stating, “[a] speedy trial analysis thus mandates a two-step inquiry: (1) whether the delay violated [Rule 600]; and, if not, then (2
- stating “[t]he Commonwealth must do everything reasonable within its power to guarantee that a trial begins on time[.]” (emphasis added, citation omitted)
- noting Pennsylvania adopted the predecessor to Rule 600 to provide clearer administration and enforcement of a defendant’s speedy trial rights than the “amorphous” test formulated in Barker
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Stabile, Strassburger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. MaddreySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-02-22· cited 159×
- Commonwealth v. LeanerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-01-08· cited 105×
- Commonwealth v. Barbour, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-07-18· cited 85×
- Com. v. Wiggins, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-04-01· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. DixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-06-07· cited 18×
- Com. v. Martz, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-04-28· cited 4×
- Com. v. Speed, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-09-11· cited 1×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-07-13· cited 536×
- Commonwealth v. RamosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-11-15· cited 163×
- Commonwealth v. BradfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-05-30· cited 136×
- Commonwealth v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-07-12· cited 125×
- Commonwealth v. McNearSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-06-14· cited 85×
- Commonwealth v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-05-12· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. PetersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-05-04· cited 73×
- Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-09-24· cited 68×
- Commonwealth v. BrockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-01-23· cited 59×
- Commonwealth v. DeBlaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-29· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. KearseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-13· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-05-19· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. TerfinkoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-13· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-03-31· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. MonoskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-07-15· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. SloanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-05-28· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. BoozeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-05-01· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. PichiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-30· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. HaynesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-04· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.