Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 5/28/2013
Commonwealth v. Sloan
Citations
- 67 A.3d 1249
- 2013 Pa. Super. 132
- 2013 WL 2303002
- 2013 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1122
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- district attorneys have non- delegable duty to monitor the timely progression of the case
- due diligence requires reasonable effort, not perfect vigilance or punctilious care
- discharging a defendant for a Rule 600 violation
- discharging a defendant for a Rule 600 violation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Musmanno, Panella, Strassburger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. HuntSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-09-10· cited 227×
- Commonwealth v. RamosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-11-15· cited 163×
- Commonwealth v. BradfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-05-30· cited 136×
- Commonwealth v. LynnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-01-13· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-08· cited 16×
- Com. v. SloanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-05-27· cited 1×
- Commonwealth v. SloanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-10-24· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.