Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 5/1/2008
Commonwealth v. Booze
Citations
- 947 A.2d 1287
- 2008 Pa. Super. 92
- 2008 Pa. Super. LEXIS 645
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the time period during which the Commonwealth failed to initiate extradition proceedings counted against them for speedy trial purposes
- mechanical run date for purposes of Rule 600 is 365 days after filing of complaint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Green, Lally, Panella, Tamilia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. NatividadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-12-27· cited 251×
- Commonwealth v. HuntSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-09-10· cited 227×
- Commonwealth v. RamosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-11-15· cited 163×
- Commonwealth v. SneddonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-09-20· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-08-26· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. KubinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-02· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.