Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Clayton

Citations

  • 63 Mass. App. Ct. 608
  • 827 N.E.2d 1273
  • 2005 Mass. App. LEXIS 488

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating, in holding direct estoppel barred defendant’s argument, “In this appeal, the defendant makes no new factual or legal argument. He offers only that [his prior appeal] was wrongly decided . . .”
  • \We have never required that there be an exact match between the evidence presented at trial and that presented to the grand jury\
  • prior decision did not work direct estoppel but did become law of case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grasso

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.