Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 9/17/1940
Peterson v. Hopson
Citations
- 306 Mass. 597
- 29 N.E.2d 140
- 132 A.L.R. 1
- 1940 Mass. LEXIS 972
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A judge should hesitate to undo his own work ... Still more should he hesitate to undo the work of another judge.”
- “[A] court orjudge is not bound to reconsider a case, an issue, or a question of fact or law, once decided”
- the power to reconsider “an issue, or a question of fact or law, once decided, . . . remains in the court until final judgment or decree”
- “When there has been no change of circumstances and no new evidence, a court is not required even to entertain, much less hold a hearing, on a reconsideration motion.”
- “A question of law not seasonably and properly saved, cannot be revived by the simple expedient of bringing it forward again, demanding a second ruling, and claiming an exception or appeal from that second ruling”
- “[tjhough there is no duty to reconsider a case, an issue, or a question of fact or law, once decided, the power to do so remains in the court until final judgment or decree”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lummus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.