Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Clayton

Citations

  • 483 A.2d 1345
  • 506 Pa. 24
  • 1984 Pa. LEXIS 362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • admitting subsequent bad act evidence of a shooting where the offenses were substantially similar, and stating that “the time span of four months between the two incidents [does not] render this evidence inadmissible in view of the numerous similarities between the incidents.”
  • admitting subsequent bad act evidence of a shooting where the offenses were substantially similar, and stating that “the time span of four months between the two incidents [does not] render this evidence inadmissible in view of the numerous similarities between the incidents.”
  • mere fact that one crime resulted in wounding rather than death would not vitiate admissibility under exception
  • mere fact that one crime resulted in wounding rather than death would not vitiate admissibility under exception
  • attempted murder properly admitted at trial for murder committed three months earlier where crimes were strikingly similar in geographic location, motivation to rob drug-dealing victims, and method of executing crime
  • attempted murder properly admitted at trial for murder committed three months earlier where crimes were strikingly similar in geographic location, motivation to rob drug-dealing victims, and method of executing crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.