Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Clark

Citations

  • 626 A.2d 154
  • 533 Pa. 579
  • 1993 Pa. LEXIS 130

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that jury would reasonably assume that a prosecutor’s open-ended question to defendant regarding statements to police embraced the defendant’s post-arrest silence
  • recognizing that “an impermissible reference to the accused’s post-arrest silence is innately prejudicial.”
  • explaining that defendant asserting ineffectiveness based upon trial strategy must demonstrate that “alternatives not chosen offered a potential for success substantially greater than the tactics utilized”
  • explaining that defendant asserting ineffectiveness based upon trial strategy must demonstrate that “alternatives not chosen offered a potential for success substantially greater than the tactics utilized”
  • explaining that a defendant asserting ineffectiveness based upon trial strategy must demonstrate that the “alternatives not chosen offered a potential for success substantially greater than the tactics utilized”
  • explaining that a defendant asserting ineffectiveness based upon trial strategy must demonstrate that the “alternatives not chosen offered a potential for success substantially greater than the tactics utilized”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Flaherty, Larsen, McDERMOTT, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.