Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Chamberlain

Citations

  • 419 A.2d 1261
  • 277 Pa. Super. 503
  • 1980 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2462

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ten pounds of marijuana along with paraphernalia was sufficient to establish intent to deliver
  • observation of tub on roof of residence containing marijuana plants furnished sufficient probable cause to issue search warrant, where private citizen informed police of plants and police officer personally observed plants
  • Warrant permitting search of “Conrad Store In Conrad, of the East fork district in Eulalia Township, R.D. 1, Austin, Pa., said building is a two-story structure painted white, located on the north side of Leg. route 52001” sufficiently specific
  • over ten pounds of marijuana

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Hester, Cavanaugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.