Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 4/8/1983
Commonwealth v. Asbury
Citations
- 458 A.2d 999
- 312 Pa. Super. 357
- 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2878
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- insufficient evidence of possession with intent to deliver: 31 pills of prazepam and chlordiacepoxide, schedule IV drugs; no testimony as to whether possession consistent with personal use of with intent to deliver
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cercone, Popovich, Van Voort
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. RoscioliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-09-19· cited 137×
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-03-13· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. WallerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-30· cited 58×
- Commonwealth v. RamboSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-03-20· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. RamboSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-06· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. WrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-04-22· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-06-28· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-14· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. GraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-03-19· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-03-28· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. ChamberlainSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-02· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-03-12· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.