Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Carter

Citations

  • 932 A.2d 1261
  • 593 Pa. 562
  • 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that documents generated in the course of regularly 11 This section reads, in pertinent part: (a
  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a state laboratory report, which indicated the presence of cocaine in materials seized from Carter, pursuant to the business records exception
  • stating the “Confrontation Clause [is] not congruent with [the rule against] hearsay[.]” (citation omitted)
  • police crime lab report fell within firmly rooted business record exception to hearsay rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gappy, Cappy, Castille, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Baldwin, Former

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.