Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 10/17/2007
Commonwealth v. Carter
Citations
- 932 A.2d 1261
- 593 Pa. 562
- 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2174
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that documents generated in the course of regularly 11 This section reads, in pertinent part: (a
- holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a state laboratory report, which indicated the presence of cocaine in materials seized from Carter, pursuant to the business records exception
- stating the “Confrontation Clause [is] not congruent with [the rule against] hearsay[.]” (citation omitted)
- police crime lab report fell within firmly rooted business record exception to hearsay rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gappy, Cappy, Castille, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Baldwin, Former
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 2,882×
- Commonwealth v. CharlestonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-06-06· cited 278×
- Commonwealth v. VasquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-03-26· cited 127×
- Commonwealth v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-29· cited 106×
- Commonwealth v. Barton-MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-09-08· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. Wallace, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-02-22
- Com. v. Smith, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-01-15
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 2,639×
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court· 1970-12-15· cited 1,926×
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court· 1943-03-01· cited 1,191×
- Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court· 2007-02-28· cited 725×
- United States v. Paul v. OatesSecond Circuit· 1977-06-03· cited 472×
- Commonwealth v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-27· cited 322×
- Commonwealth v. BruceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-01-04· cited 261×
- Commonwealth v. SlavskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1923-05-27· cited 166×
- Ernest Kay v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1958-05-17· cited 126×
- People v. McClanahanIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-04-20· cited 118×
- United States v. BakerEighth Circuit· 1988-09-02· cited 97×
- State v. KennedyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1999-02-17· cited 89×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Fox v. SwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-11-28· cited 84×
- Commonwealth v. TreiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-05-16· cited 78×
- Primavera v. Celotex Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-05-07· cited 76×
- Echo Acceptance Corp. v. Household Retail Services, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2001-09-28· cited 74×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.