Commonwealth v. Carr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, “An appellate court should be able to consider all the testimony on record to determine whether certain evidence was constitutionally admissible at trial, not just the testimony at the suppression hearing.”
• “An appellate court should be able to consider all the testimony on the record to determine whether certain evidence was constitutionally admissible at trial, not just the testimony at the suppression hearing.” (citation and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Charleston
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-02-18· cited 82×
• Commonwealth v. Ruder
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-02-25· cited 45×
• Commonwealth v. Lamb
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-01-14· cited 41×
• Commonwealth v. Colon
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-29· cited 38×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-01-06· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Gilliam
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-07-16· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Jones
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-06-03· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. McFadden
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-06-04· cited 10×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Mayfield
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-10-08· cited 277×
• Commonwealth v. Ehredt
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-05-01· cited 129×
• Commonwealth v. Antonuccio
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-12· cited 52×
• Commonwealth v. Kaschik
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-09-22· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Akridge
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-06-19· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Akridge
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-06-19· cited 9×