· 9/22/1975
Commonwealth v. Kaschik
Citations
- 235 Pa. Super. 388
- 344 A.2d 519
- 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1626
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “An appellate court should be able to consider all the testimony on record to determine whether certain evidence was constitutionally admissible at trial, not just the testimony at the suppression hearing.”
- double hearsay approved but Aguilar test was not met
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.