Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Byrd

Citations

  • 378 A.2d 921
  • 250 Pa. Super. 250
  • 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2518

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although committee comments are not binding, they may be considered as effective aids when interpreting the meaning of rules and amendments thereto
  • although committee comments are not binding, they may be considered as effective aids when interpreting the meaning of rules and amendments thereto
  • “We can perceive no reasonable legal basis for an attorney to fail to object to a violation of his client’s right to speedy trial under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100.” (Citation omitted)
  • \We can perceive no reasonable legal basis for an attorney to fail to object to a violation of his client's right to speedy trial under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100.\ (Citation omitted)
  • Concurring Opinion by HOFFMAN, J.
  • Concurring Opinion by HOFFMAN, J.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Voort 'Judge, Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Spaeth, Van Voort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.