Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Byrd

Citations

  • 425 A.2d 722
  • 493 Pa. 178
  • 1981 Pa. LEXIS 612

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that factual disputes are not resolved by the appellate courts
  • it is for the appellate court to decide the legal consequences of periods of delay under Rule 1100(d)
  • remand to determine whether in fact Rule 1100 had been violated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Brien, Roberts, Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, Kauffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.