Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Brown

Citations

  • 229 Pa. Super. 67
  • 323 A.2d 845
  • 1974 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating in dicta that “[i]t is not necessary for an indictment for conspiracy to be brought against all the conspirators and it is not necessary that all the parties to a conspiracy be named, so long as it appears that two or more persons conspired to commit the offense charged”
  • no abuse of discretion to refuse motion for continuance because of amendment of indictment to add name of co-conspirator where appellant was aware several months before trial of the name of the co-conspirator
  • no abuse of discretion to refuse motion for continuance because of amendment of indictment to add name of co-conspirator where appellant was aware several months before trial of the name of the co-conspirator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cercone, Hoffman, Jacobs, Price, Spaeth, Watkins, Yoort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.