Commonwealth v. Neal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where original and amended indictments charged different subsections of crime of robbery found in Crimes Code, because each would require proof of different elements, amendment was improper because it was substantive and conviction vacated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Holcomb
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-10-04· cited 114×
• Commonwealth v. Gray
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-01· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Harvin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-10-04· cited 14×
• United States v. Singleton
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-04-26· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Kopp
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-31· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Pellecchia
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-05-29· cited 5×
• United States v. Sunday
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2018-07-25· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-06-21· cited 23×
• Commonwealth v. Jones
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-06· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Bruce
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-09-23· cited 21×