Kinley v. Bierly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying 3 Restatement [Second], supra, § 518, but concluding that plaintiff was required to show that animal had known mischievous propensities to prevail on negligence claim
• applying the Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 509 and 518 in considering whether an owner was liable for injuries sustained when its horse bit the plaintiff
• Judicial notice allows the trial court to accept into evidence indisputable facts to avoid the formality of introducing evidence to prove an incontestable issue.
• applying same elements in horse bite case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).