Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 12/30/2003
Commonwealth v. Brooks
Citations
- 839 A.2d 245
- 576 Pa. 332
- 2003 Pa. LEXIS 2563
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding failure to hold any meetings with defendant before trial was ineffective assistance of counsel
- indicating trial counsel “never once met with [the defendant] in person before his trial”
- indicating trial counsel “never once met with [the defendant] in person before his trial”
- under Strickland, counsel's failure to meet in person with the defendant before trial constituted ineffective assistance of counsel
- new trial awarded, where the defense attorney “never once met with [his client] before his trial on capital charges”
- “[A] busy schedule simply cannot serve as a reasonable basis for failing to have personal contact with a client prior to that client’s trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Lamb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-03-18· cited 958×
- Commonwealth v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-12-10· cited 336×
- Commonwealth v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-11-26· cited 238×
- Commonwealth v. GarciaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-06-17· cited 231×
- Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-11-21· cited 165×
- Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-12-27· cited 131×
- Com. of Pa. v. DiazSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-03-23· cited 94×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-08-15· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. SpencerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-01-25· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. BrittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-12-20· cited 35×
- Com. v. Hand, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-05-28· cited 34×
- Urquhart v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2019-01-24· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-08-12· cited 11×
- Com. v. Saylor, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-01-18· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. HawkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-04-19· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. Thomas, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-09-26
- Commonwealth v. Johnson, M, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-03-26
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 6,497×
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court· 2002-05-28· cited 4,309×
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-06-09· cited 2,071×
- Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2002-03-27· cited 1,451×
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 1,330×
- Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1961-11-13· cited 1,308×
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-31· cited 1,205×
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-30· cited 1,182×
- White v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 1,066×
- Brooks v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 601×
- Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-05-30· cited 478×
- Ferguson v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1961-03-27· cited 363×
- Williams v. KaiserSupreme Court· 1945-01-08· cited 342×
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-07-01· cited 246×
- Commonwealth v. LopezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-10-01· cited 83×
- Commonwealth v. PerrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-07-01· cited 71×
- Commonwealth v. BalodisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-02-24· cited 60×
- Commonwealth v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-11-24· cited 48×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.