Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Britt

Citations

  • 83 A.3d 198
  • 2013 Pa. Super. 321
  • 2013 WL 6732041
  • 2013 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that - 13 - J-S33027-18 appellant cannot seek review of ineffectiveness claims on direct appeal
  • holding untimely filing of Rule 1925(b) statement by counsel is per se ineffective assistance of counsel
  • holding untimely filing of Rule 1925(b) statement by counsel is per se ineffective assistance of counsel
  • noting that a petitioner seeking to establish counsel was ineffective in failing to meet with him or her must show actual prejudice
  • holding ineffectiveness claim not reviewable on direct appeal because claim was not apparent from record and appellant did not waive PCRA review
  • holding untimely filing of Rule 1925(b) statement by counsel is per se ineffective assistance of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Donohue, Ott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.