Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 9/21/1990
Commonwealth v. Bricker
Citations
- 581 A.2d 147
- 525 Pa. 362
- 1990 Pa. LEXIS 172
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the evidence established that the Commonwealth’s chief witness, testifying pursuant to a plea agreement and as a participant in the federal witness protection program, was a co-conspirator to a murder
- describing the harmless error rule; an error cannot be held harmless unless the appellate court determines that the error could not have contributed to the verdict
- describing the harmless error rule; an error cannot be held harmless unless the appellate court determines that the error could not have contributed to the verdict
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-04· cited 461×
- Commonwealth v. TedfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-11-19· cited 325×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-11-22· cited 233×
- Commonwealth v. SpenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-06-30· cited 144×
- Commonwealth v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-05-24· cited 131×
- Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-12-01· cited 116×
- Commonwealth v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-31· cited 107×
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-09-05· cited 103×
- Commonwealth v. MooseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-22· cited 101×
- Commonwealth v. StokesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-10-06· cited 99×
- Commonwealth v. CottamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-17· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-04· cited 90×
- Commonwealth v. BarnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-07-31· cited 74×
- Commonwealth v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-10-31· cited 60×
- In re M.T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-04-20· cited 54×
- Commonwealth v. SattazahnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-07-30· cited 53×
- Commonwealth v. HackettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-06-30· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. FoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-01-14· cited 41×
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-12-30· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-07-15· cited 36×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-01-26· cited 730×
- Commonwealth v. ZettlemoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-30· cited 709×
- Commonwealth v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-06-06· cited 230×
- Pioneer Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1983-08-23· cited 229×
- Commonwealth v. BishopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-04-28· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-04-25· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. TannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-27· cited 53×
- Commonwealth v. RitchieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-11· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. BurtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-16· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. KubiacSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-11-02· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. BrickerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-13· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-06-02· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. GwaltneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-06-02· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. UpshurSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-02-05· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.