Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Beasley

Citations

  • 967 A.2d 376
  • 600 Pa. 458
  • 2009 Pa. LEXIS 383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “... the United States Supreme Court has maintained that its opinions in the Williams and Wiggins line ‘made no new law,’ but rather, represent an application of clearly established precedent”
  • stating that “Lthe United States Supreme Court has maintained that its opinions in the Williams and Wiggins line ‘made no new law,’ but rather, represent an application of clearly established precedent”
  • stating that “Lthe United States Supreme Court has maintained that its opinions in the Williams and Wiggins line ‘made no new law,’ but rather, represent an application of clearly established precedent”
  • remanding for the PCRA court to resolve ―areas of material, factual controversy and material credibility disputes‖
  • reflecting a remand where trial counsel attested that he was not aware that he could adduce life-history and mental-health information in penalty proceedings and that he conducted no investigation along such lines
  • remanding to permit the PCRA court to prepare an opinion addressing all claims raised in the amended post-conviction petition, and expressly resolve areas of material, factual controversy and material credibility disputes via numbered factual findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Greenspan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.