Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Robertson

Citations

  • 186 A.3d 440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that when the only factor weighing against voluntariness was that an individual was in custody, “[n]o reasonable fact-finder could weigh [the] factors and determine that [a person’s consent is] involuntary”
  • finding consent voluntary where police did not use coercive tactics, defendant was informed of her right to refuse, and subsequently cooperated with the blood draw
  • “police officers had no affirmative duty to tell [motorist] she would not be subjected to enhanced criminal penalties if she refused the blood tests.” (emphasis in original)
  • analyzing voluntariness of consent to blood draw

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panella, Olson, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.