Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Anderson

Citations

  • 353 A.2d 384
  • 466 Pa. 339
  • 1976 Pa. LEXIS 492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The court below, having conducted an evidentiary hearing concerning the recantations with an opportunity to observe and judge the demeanor and credibility of the witness…cannot be said to have abused its discretion in denying appellant a new trial.”
  • no abuse of discretion where trial court denied motion for [a] new trial based on after-discovered evidence where witness recanted the after-discovered recantation testimony at an evidentiary hearing and stated that his testimony at trial implicating the defendant was the truth

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Manderino, Nix

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.