Commonwealth v. Reed

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Commonwealth is not required to prove explicit or formal agreement in order to establish existence of conspiracy, which may be proven by circumstantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Emmi
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-08-21· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-03-12· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Payne
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-05-14· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Asbury
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-08· cited 3×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-03-28
• Commonwealth v. Gerhart
  Carbon County Court of Common Pleas· 2007-03-08
• Commonwealth v. Chambers
  Mercer County Court of Common Pleas· 1983-01-10

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Eiland
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-16· cited 148×
• Commonwealth v. Roscioli
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-09-19· cited 137×
• Commonwealth v. Neff
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-03-20· cited 53×
• Commonwealth v. Burton
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-16· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Eyler
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1907-04-15· cited 40×
• Commonwealth v. Batley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-01-09· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. Cameron
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-04-19· cited 25×
• Gaines v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1864-10-20· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Caulfield
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1905-05-01· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Caulfield
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1905-01-17· cited 6×