Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/5/2017

Commonwealth v. Knox

Citations

165 A.3d 925
2017 Pa. Super. 173
2017 WL 2417826
2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding Knox’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel was not “ripe” for review on direct appeal but addressing the merits of his challenge to the discretionary aspects of sentence
holding Knox’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel was not “ripe” for review on direct appeal but addressing the merits of his challenge to the discretionary aspects of sentence
setting forth prerequisites for merits review of discretionary aspects of sentence claim
credibility challenges are not proper subject of sufficiency claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panella, Stabile, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.