Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 11/18/1957
Commonwealth Ex Rel. O'Brien v. O'Brien
Citations
- 390 Pa. 551
- 136 A.2d 451
- 1957 Pa. LEXIS 322
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a statute providing for blood testing in \any proceeding to establish paternity\ did not authorize blood tests in a proceeding by the putative father to challenge paternity
- holding that the presumption of paternity “is essential in any society in which the family is the fundamental unit”
- holding that a statute providing for blood testing in “any proceeding to establish paternity” did not authorize blood tests in a proceeding by the putative father to challenge paternity
- stating that the provision applies only to proceedings “brought to establish paternity”
- noting the admissibility into evidence of blood grouping tests in certain cases, though not those where the presumption applies
- noting the admissibility into evidence of blood grouping tests in certain cases, though not those where the presumption applies
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chidsey, Jones, Bell, Ci-Iidsey, Musmanno, Arnold, Cohen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- John M. v. Paula T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-03-19· cited 141×
- Brinkley v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-09-17· cited 129×
- Ex Parte JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama· 1998-07-17· cited 76×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Goldman v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-09-14· cited 50×
- In Re Adoption of YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-10-20· cited 46×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Weston v. WestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-09-12· cited 46×
- Christianson v. ElySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-01-08· cited 41×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Palchinski v. PalchinskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-13· cited 40×
- Kohler v. BleemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-02-06· cited 38×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Nedzwecky v. NedzweckySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-04-14· cited 34×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hall v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-09-11· cited 30×
- McCue v. McCueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-03-10· cited 28×
- Culhane v. MichelsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-07-26· cited 24×
- Jones v. TrojakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-07-29· cited 23×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Miller v. DillworthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-12-08· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. CarrasquillaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-11-11· cited 20×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Leider v. LeiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-05-28· cited 19×
- Miscovich v. MiscovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-01-10· cited 18×
- RUTH F. v. Robert B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-02-06· cited 17×
- McKenzie Mary E. v. Harris, Patricia, Secretary of Health & Human Services of the United States, Mary McKenzieThird Circuit· 1982-05-21· cited 10×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-05-27· cited 108×
- Cairgle v. AMERICAN R. AND SS CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1951-01-02· cited 91×
- Cairgle v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1951-01-02· cited 80×
- Cortese v. CorteseNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1950-11-15· cited 62×
- Beach v. BeachD.C. Circuit· 1940-06-28· cited 54×
- People v. MummertCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1943-03-29· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. StattiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-05-20· cited 36×
- Kemp v. Government of Canal ZoneFifth Circuit· 1948-05-15· cited 26×
- Groulx v. GroulxSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1954-03-02· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. StappenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1957-06-04· cited 24×
- Hill v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-01-30· cited 20×
- Commonwealth ex rel. O'Brien v. O'BrienSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-12-28· cited 18×
- State v. SargentSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1955-12-06· cited 14×
- State v. EliNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1954-02-03· cited 8×
- Scalone v. ScaloneNew York Supreme Court· 1950-06-08· cited 8×
- C v. CNew York Supreme Court· 1951-11-01· cited 8×
- Cuneo v. CuneoNew York Supreme Court· 1950-04-24· cited 7×
- Houston v. HoustonNew York Family Court· 1950-07-07· cited 4×
Other cases named Commonwealth Ex Rel. O'Brien v. O'Brien
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.