Supreme Court of Alabama· 7/17/1998
Ex Parte Jenkins
Citations
- 723 So. 2d 649
- 1998 WL 399866
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the retroactive application of a statute to change the reopening provisions of paternity judgments finalized before the statute was enacted violated the separation-of-powers doctrine
- \`\[A] judgment conclusively resolves the case\ because \a judicial Power\ is one to render dispositive judgments.'\
- \'Any interested party may bring an action at any time for the purpose of determining the existence or non-existence of the father and child relationship.'\(citing A LA . C O D E 1975; § 26-17-6(b))
- applying the anti-retroactivity canon without a threshold finding of ambiguity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: See
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama· 2000-11-22· cited 428×
- Kirby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 2004-08-27· cited 104×
- People v. BunnCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-01-10· cited 89×
- Holt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2006-03-03· cited 56×
- Town of Cedar Bluff v. Citizens Caring for ChildrenSupreme Court of Alabama· 2004-12-30· cited 42×
- Birmingham-Jefferson Civic Ctr. Auth. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama· 2005-05-03· cited 37×
- Muhammad v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama· 2007-12-07· cited 31×
- Gallant v. GallantCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2014-12-19· cited 31×
- McInnish v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama· 2005-09-30· cited 28×
- City of Daphne v. City of Spanish FortSupreme Court of Alabama· 2003-01-17· cited 27×
- Ex Parte ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama· 2007-03-16· cited 25×
- Ex Parte Chemical Waste Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2005-11-18· cited 25×
- Schoenvogel v. Venator Group Retail, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2004-07-09· cited 24×
- Dept. of Environmental Management v. LeafCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2007-05-11· cited 21×
- S.W.M. v. D.W.M.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1998-10-23· cited 18×
- Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 2006-12-22· cited 17×
- Magee v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama· 2015-03-02· cited 16×
- Opinion of the Justices No. 380Supreme Court of Alabama· 2004-03-31· cited 15×
- Ex Parte KingSupreme Court of Alabama· 2010-04-23· cited 11×
- S.C.G. v. J.G.Y.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2000-09-08· cited 9×
Cites
75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court· 1976-03-02· cited 7,274×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court· 1976-02-27· cited 4,982×
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 2,482×
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court· 1971-11-22· cited 1,968×
- Estes v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 1,725×
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court· 1952-06-02· cited 1,646×
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1920-06-07· cited 1,251×
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 1,199×
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court· 1995-04-18· cited 1,015×
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court· 1922-11-20· cited 1,012×
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court· 1944-05-15· cited 1,010×
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 800×
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court· 1941-01-13· cited 774×
- Caban v. MohammedSupreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 738×
- Clark v. JeterSupreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 679×
- Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation SurvivorsSupreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 527×
- Lalli v. LalliSupreme Court· 1978-12-11· cited 430×
- United States v. Sioux Nation of IndiansSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 334×
- Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama· 1991-09-27· cited 156×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.